The Uralic expansion into Fennoscandia and Eastern Europe starting ca. 2000 BCE brought about intensive contacts with the Indo-European speakers in the area. Thus, ca. 200 Balto-Slavic / Baltic loanwords in the Finnic languages (2000–1000BCE or 1^st Mill. BCE), 32 in Saamic, and 36 in Mordvinic are found. Particularly interesting type of loanwords would be the kinship loanwords between these language groups.

On one hand, they enable us to formulate several hypotheses as to how the family structure and marriage practice of the donor language are reflected in the recipient language. On the other hand, ancient demographic investigation could test those hypotheses, leading to a more concrete reconstruction of their contact situation.

In this mini seminar, we will present the summary of kinship loanwords between Baltic and Finno-Ugric languages with the Indo-European background of the family structure. We will further discuss the implication of these loanwords in this context.

Germanic-speaking populations historically form an integral component of the North and Northwest European cultural configuration. According to linguistic consensus, the common ancestor of the Germanic languages, which include German, English, Frisian, Dutch as well as the Nordic languages, was spoken in Northern Europe during the Pre-Roman Iron Age. However, important questions remain concerning the earlier Bronze Age distribution of this Indo-European language branch in Scandinavia as well as the driving factors behind its Late Iron Age diversification and expansion across the European continent. A key difficulty in addressing these questions are the existence of striking differences in the interpretation of the archaeological record, leading to various hypotheses of correlations with linguistic dispersals and changes in material culture. Moreover, these interpretations have been difficult to assess using genomics due to limited ancient genomes and the difficulty in differentiating closely related populations.

Here we integrate multidisciplinary evidence from population genomics, historical sources, archaeology and linguistics to offer a fully revised model for the origins and spread of Germanic languages and for the formation of the genomic ancestry of Germanic-speaking northern European populations, while acknowledging that coordinating archaeology, linguistics and genetics is complex and potentially controversial. We sequenced 710 ancient human genomes from western Eurasia and analysed them together with 3,940 published genomes suitable for imputing diploid genotypes. We find evidence of a previously unknown, large-scale Bronze Age migration within Scandinavia, originating in the east and becoming widespread to the west and south, thus providing a new potential driving factor for the expansion of the Germanic speech community. This East Scandinavian genetic cluster is first seen 800 years after the arrival of the Corded Ware Culture, the first Steppe-related population to emerge in Northern Europe, opening a new scenario implying a Late rather than an Middle Neolithic arrival of the Germanic language group in Scandinavia. Moreover, the non-local Hunter-Gatherer ancestry of this East Scandinavian cluster is indicative of a cross-Baltic maritime rather than a southern Scandinavian land-based entry.

Later in the Iron Age around 1700 BP, we find a southward push of admixed Eastern and Southern Scandinavians into areas including Germany and the Netherlands, previously associated with Celtic speakers, mixing with local populations from the Eastern North Sea coast. During the Migration Period (1575-1200 BP), we find evidence of this structured, admixed Southern Scandinavian population representing the Western Germanic Anglo-Saxon migrations into Britain and Langobards into southern Europe. During the Migration Period, we detect a previously unknown northward migration back into Southern Scandinavia, partly replacing earlier inhabitants and forming the North Germanic-speaking Viking-Age populations of Denmark and southern Sweden, corresponding with historically attested Danes.

However, the origin and character of these major changes in Scandinavia before the Viking Age remain contested. In contrast to these Western and Northern Germanic-speaking populations, we find the Wielbark population from Poland to be primarily of Eastern Scandinavian ancestry, supporting a Swedish origin for East Germanic groups. In contrast, the later cultural descendants, the Ostrogoths and Visigoths are predominantly of Southern European ancestry implying the adoption of Gothic culture. Together, these results highlight the use of archaeology, linguistics and genetics as distinct but complementary lines of evidence.

Link to the article (prepress)

Towards the end of the Neolithic period significant cultural change seems to occur among the hunter-gatherer communities of northern Fennoscandia. In Sweden the hunter-gatherer communities seemingly abandon a long tradition of a more sedentary settlement system based around the semi-subterranean dwellings, and instead adopt a more mobile pattern. This occurs alongside other significant changes in the material culture, as well as in their symbolic imagery. A technology that appears to be reintroduced to northern Fennoscandia around this time is the bifacial point (arrow- and spearheads). These are largely made from locally sourced materials like quartz and quartzite (in some areas also flint).

Arguments have been made that the North Swedish groups mainly utilized the raw material sources present in the mountain region, producing preforms that are then brought to the forest settlements where they are finished. There is a lack of provenance studies based on quartz and quartzite material, however, partly owing to the ubiquitous distribution of the material in the landscape. This makes it difficult to establish a link between the potential sources and the artefacts. In a recent PhD project at Umeå University an interdisciplinary approach incorporating exploratory spectroscopic and spatial analysis was used in the study of bifacial points from Västerbotten County. Reliable characterization of the raw material is necessary in order to understand human mobility related to raw material extraction and use. There are a number of confounding factors related to the material and artefact type, however, including chronology, data availability, instrumentation and excavation context.