Arguments have been made that the North Swedish groups mainly utilized the raw material sources present in the mountain region, producing preforms that are then brought to the forest settlements where they are finished. There is a lack of provenance studies based on quartz and quartzite material, however, partly owing to the ubiquitous distribution of the material in the landscape. This makes it difficult to establish a link between the potential sources and the artefacts. In a recent PhD project at Umeå University an interdisciplinary approach incorporating exploratory spectroscopic and spatial analysis was used in the study of bifacial points from Västerbotten County. Reliable characterization of the raw material is necessary in order to understand human mobility related to raw material extraction and use. There are a number of confounding factors related to the material and artefact type, however, including chronology, data availability, instrumentation and excavation context.

Towards the end of the Neolithic period significant cultural change seems to occur among the hunter-gatherer communities of northern Fennoscandia. In Sweden the hunter-gatherer communities seemingly abandon a long tradition of a more sedentary settlement system based around the semi-subterranean dwellings, and instead adopt a more mobile pattern. This occurs alongside other significant changes in the material culture, as well as in their symbolic imagery. A technology that appears to be reintroduced to northern Fennoscandia around this time is the bifacial point (arrow- and spearheads). These are largely made from locally sourced materials like quartz and quartzite (in some areas also flint).